Brave New World features complex characters representing different aspects of society and the human condition.
**John the Savage**: Raised on the Reservation reading Shakespeare, John enters the World State with romantic ideals about love, honor, and meaning. His mother Linda came from the World State but got stranded on the Reservation pregnant, which horrified her—natural birth is obscene in her culture. John is caught between two worlds: too "civilized" for the Reservation (he's white, literate, different), too "savage" for the World State (he wants monogamy, believes in God, values art). His suicide isn't just depression—it's the impossibility of authentic existence in a world that's eliminated authenticity. He represents what humanity loses when we choose comfort over meaning.
**Bernard Marx**: The Alpha-Plus with an inferiority complex because he's physically smaller than other Alphas (possibly alcohol in his blood surrogate during bottle-growth). He questions the system not from principles but from resentment at not fitting in. When bringing John back makes him popular, Bernard becomes insufferable, proving he wanted status, not actual change. Huxley is showing that outsiders don't automatically become heroes—sometimes they just want to be accepted by the system they criticize.
**Lenina Crowne**: The perfect World State citizen who genuinely doesn't understand John's objections to casual sex. She likes him and offers herself, confused when he calls her a whore. She takes soma whenever uncomfortable feelings arise. She's not evil or stupid—she's fully socialized into this world. Her inability to comprehend John's perspective shows how complete the conditioning is. She represents people who are happy in oppressive systems because they don't know alternatives exist.
**Mustapha Mond**: The World Controller who's read Shakespeare and understands exactly what was sacrificed for stability. Unlike Napoleon in Animal Farm who's just power-hungry, Mond genuinely believes the World State is better than the alternative. He's read history—the wars, famines, diseases—and thinks eliminating human suffering justifies eliminating human freedom. His debate with John is the book's philosophical core: is happiness without freedom worth it? Mond says yes, knowing full well what that costs.